This page is for small UK business owners trying to decide whether to spend £200-£400 on a WordPress build or several hundred more on something custom. The short answer: for most service businesses, custom wins on every measurable dimension — cost over five years, speed, security, SEO, simplicity. The long answer is below.

Quick verdict

If you're an editorial publisher posting daily, run a 500-product ecommerce store, or genuinely need contributor accounts and an editor workflow — WordPress is fine. For everyone else, custom is better.

Side-by-side

Factor WordPress Custom (£650 build)
Up-front cost£200-£400 (cheap template)£650 (hand-coded, all features)
Monthly cost£40-£100 (hosting + plugins + maintenance)£0-£15 (Netlify free tier covers most builds)
5-year total cost~£2,800-£6,400~£650-£1,550
Page load time2-5 seconds typicalUnder 1 second typical
Core Web VitalsOften fail without effortPass by default
SecurityMost-hacked CMS on the webStatic — near-zero attack surface
MaintenanceWeekly plugin/core updatesNone required
HostingDedicated WP host (£15-40/mo)Netlify / Cloudflare (free tier)
Content updatesEasy via Gutenberg editor10-15 mins via admin or request
SEO ceilingPlugin-dependentNative schema, semantic HTML, clean <head>
Lock-inTied to host + plugin ecosystemStandard HTML/CSS/JS — portable anywhere

The cost myth

"WordPress is free" is the line. It isn't. The software is free; the operating cost is not. A working WordPress site for a small business typically needs:

Add it up over five years: somewhere between £2,800 and £6,400 if you're outsourcing the maintenance. A custom £650 build runs on Netlify's free tier and needs no plugins to maintain. An optional £45/month maintenance plan exists for businesses that want hands-off ownership, but it's optional, not load-bearing.

Speed and Core Web Vitals

Speed isn't vanity. Google uses Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal. Slow sites rank lower, full stop. WordPress sites — even on premium hosts, even with caching plugins — typically have:

Custom static sites measured on the Chrome UX Report sit at sub-1s LCP, sub-100ms INP, zero CLS. Same content, very different ranking trajectory.

Security

WordPress powers ~43% of all websites. That's the strength — vast ecosystem, lots of help available — and the weakness — it's the single biggest target on the web. Most small-business hacks come from one of three vectors:

  1. Outdated plugins with known CVEs
  2. Brute-force attacks on /wp-login.php
  3. Compromised theme code

A custom static site has no admin login, no plugin layer, no database. There's almost nothing to compromise. The recovery cost when a WordPress site does get hacked — usually a £200-500 cleanup, plus reputation damage if Google flags the site as compromised — is genuinely worth thinking about.

SEO comparison

The persistent myth: "WordPress is better for SEO." It isn't. SEO is overwhelmingly about page speed, semantic HTML, schema markup, content quality, and backlinks — all of which are platform-agnostic. Practical SEO services work on either.

What's actually different:

When WordPress wins

To be fair to WordPress, there are real cases where it's the right answer:

Verdict for small businesses

If you're a plumber, salon, consultant, accountant, gym, café, photographer, electrician, lawyer or any small service business with a website that needs 6-10 pages, a contact form, decent local SEO and to load fast on a mid-range phone — get a custom build. It's cheaper over five years, faster, more secure, ranks better, and you actually own it.

If you don't believe me, the next time you're on someone's WordPress site, open Chrome DevTools → Network tab → reload. Compare the request count, transfer size and time-to-interactive with this site. The numbers tell the story.

This isn't a "WordPress is bad" rant. WordPress is a remarkable piece of software. It's just the wrong tool for most small business websites.